El Suicidio y el Realismo Mágico: ¿Cómo la Amazonía Colombiana Apaciguó la Epidemia de las Cuerdas?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
¿Cómo comprender el suicidio y lasformas en que las comunidades lo abordan cuando ni la palabra “suicidio” ni el cuerpo anatómico-fisiológico existen en sus lenguas y cosmovisiones? Desde la modernidad y su poder colonial, esto ha implicado una imposición epistémica que nombra como suicidio aquello que no lo es, interviene sobre un cuerpo inexistente y deslegitima saberes fuera de la suicidiología eurocéntrica. Aquí intento desprenderme de la violencia epistémica de la modernidad y su colonialidadpara escuchar, aprender y sentipensar otras corporalidades y relaciones con el sufrimiento humano y no humano que invocan el mal morir, o la llamada “epidemia de las cuerdas “en la Amazonía colombiana. Propongo resentipensar otras formas de abordar el sufrimiento, la vida y la muerte más allá del eurocentrismo. Discuto el suicidio desde lo real-mágico y el sentipensar andino-amazónico de comunidades indigenizadas que lograron apaciguar dicha epidemia a partir de saberes ancestrales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".