Comparative evaluation of the time required to remove intraradicular retainers using piezoelectric ultrasonic systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Description (EN) Title: Comparative evaluation of the time required to remove intraradicular retainers using piezoelectric ultrasonic systems What this record is This deposit supports a Zenodo DOI record for the conference abstract PI005, published in the Brazilian Oral Research supplement (Proceedings of the 23rd Annual SBPqO Meeting, 2006). Important (copyright / source) This record does not redistribute the publisher’s PDF and does not reproduce the full abstract text. It provides citation metadata and an original summary only.For the official published source, please add the SBPqO proceedings PDF as a Zenodo Related identifier. Official source (to add as Related identifier):https://www.sbpqo.org.br/resumos/2006/supl%202006.pdf Recommended citation (Vancouver) Gonçalves L, Silva HC, Pedro FLM, Borges AH, Piovesan JF, Kfakze CG, Piva RD, Signor DR. Comparative evaluation of the time required to remove intraradicular retainers using piezoelectric ultrasonic systems. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual SBPqO Meeting. Braz Oral Res. 2006;20(Suppl):49. Abstract PI005. Summary (original) In vitro comparison of the time required to remove intraradicular retainers (cast posts) from extracted mandibular premolars using two piezoelectric ultrasonic systems (Gnatus vs Dabi Atlante). Removal time was used as the effectiveness criterion; the Gnatus group showed shorter removal times in this experiment. Metadata at a glance Type: Conference paper (conference abstract) Conference: 23rd Annual SBPqO Meeting (Brazilian Society for Dental Research) Abstract ID: PI005 Journal/Proceedings: Brazilian Oral Research. 2006;20(Suppl):49 ISSN: 1806-8324; 1807-3107 Primary creator ORCID: 0009-0004-8140-2876 Descrição (PT-BR) Título: Avaliação comparativa do tempo de remoção de retentores intra-radiculares com sistemas de ultrassom piezoelétrico O que é este registro Este depósito dá suporte a um registro de DOI no Zenodo para o resumo de congresso PI005, publicado no suplemento da Brazilian Oral Research (Anais da 23ª Reunião Anual da SBPqO, 2006). Importante (direitos autorais / fonte) Este registro não redistribui o PDF do editor e não reproduz o texto completo do resumo publicado. Ele contém apenas metadados de citação e um resumo original.Para acesso à fonte oficial, adicione o PDF dos anais da SBPqO como Identificador relacionado (Related identifier) no Zenodo. Fonte oficial (para incluir como Related identifier):https://www.sbpqo.org.br/resumos/2006/supl%202006.pdf Citação recomendada (Vancouver) Gonçalves L, Silva HC, Pedro FLM, Borges AH, Piovesan JF, Kfakze CG, Piva RD, Signor DR. Comparative evaluation of the time required to remove intraradicular retainers using piezoelectric ultrasonic systems. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual SBPqO Meeting. Braz Oral Res. 2006;20(Suppl):49. Abstract PI005. Resumo (original) Estudo in vitro comparando o tempo necessário para remoção de retentores intra-radiculares (pinos metálicos fundidos) em pré-molares inferiores extraídos, utilizando dois sistemas de ultrassom piezoelétrico (Gnatus vs Dabi Atlante). O tempo de remoção foi o critério de efetividade; o grupo Gnatus apresentou menor tempo no experimento. Metadados (visão rápida) Tipo: Trabalho em congresso (resumo) Evento: 23ª Reunião Anual da SBPqO (Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica) ID do resumo: PI005 Periódico/Anais: Brazilian Oral Research. 2006;20(Suppl):49 ISSN: 1806-8324; 1807-3107 ORCID do autor principal: 0009-0004-8140-2876
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".