ECOLOGICAL-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT OF THE ARCTIC REGIONS OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article substantiates the need for the development of minerals in the Arctic Zone. It was noted that countries such as the United States of America, Canada, Denmark, and Norway have stepped up scientific research related to exploration, modernization, and upgrading of mining equipment in the Arctic. The People's Republic of China is also showing interest in the Arctic, primarily due to the need to monitor the Arctic climate, which will change in the future due to the melting of ice and will contribute to the extraction of minerals. In addition, the authors consider the dynamics of quantitative values of groups of indicators characterizing this type of economic activity in the territories of the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation, such as the volume of mining, the rate of change in mining volumes, the rate of change in price indices for goods of this type of activity, as well as the volume of mining adjusted for price indices. The analysis of the dynamics of these indicators is carried out for the period from 2010 to 2023: as a result, it allows us to calculate short-term forecasts of price-adjusted mining volumes in the territories of not only the regions of the Arctic Zone, but also in the territories of macro-regions, all regions of the Arctic Zone in aggregate and in the Russian Federation as a whole. Conclusions were drawn about the need for exploration and development of new deposits, primarily in the territory of the Chukotka Autonomous Okrug, based on the implementation of Russian, including joint projects, to develop natural resource reserves in the Arctic zone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".