MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7131361903 · doi:10.2196/85875

Uncovering the Reasons Behind Maternal Care Dropout in Bangladesh: Cross-sectional study (Preprint)

2025· article· en· W7131361903 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Syeda Saima Alam, Plabon Sarkar, M. A. Rifat, Sumaiya Jahan, Rokibul Islam, Israt Jahan, Sanjib Saha

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Public Health and Surveillance · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Maternal and Child Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDropout (neural networks)MEDLINEPregnancyPopulationPublic health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Utilization of the maternal continuum of care (CoC)-comprising adequate antenatal care (ANC), skilled birth attendance, and postnatal care (PNC)-is critical for improving maternal and child health outcomes. However, dropout from the CoC remains substantial in Bangladesh, with women discontinuing services at different stages of pregnancy, delivery, and postpartum care. Objective: This study aimed to quantify maternal dropout at each stage of the CoC and identify socioeconomic and demographic factors associated with discontinuity, comparing two nationally representative survey rounds. Methods: Data were drawn from the Bangladesh Demographic and Health Surveys (BDHS) 2017-2018 and 2022. Women aged 15 to 49 years with a live birth in the preceding 2 to 3 years were included. Completion of full CoC was defined as receiving at least 4 ANC visits, delivering with a skilled birth attendant, and obtaining at least 1 PNC contact within 48 hours of delivery. Predisposing (age, education, parity, religion, and division), enabling (wealth index, media exposure, health care access, and residence), and need factors (terminated pregnancy and desired pregnancy status) were identified using the Andersen Behavioral Model. Survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression models were fitted for each CoC component and overall CoC completion, with interaction terms to assess whether associations differed between survey rounds. Results: Among 8424 mothers, 27.9% (n=2350) failed to complete all components of the maternal CoC. Dropout was highest at the ANC stage (n=4962, 55.7%), followed by PNC (n=3976, 47.2%) and skilled birth attendant-assisted delivery (n=3378, 40.1%). Between survey rounds, overall CoC dropout decreased significantly from 31.9% (BDHS 2017-2018) to 22.4% (BDHS 2022), reflecting modest improvements in service continuity. Factors significantly associated with higher odds of CoC dropout included lower maternal education (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.70, 95% CI 1.94-3.77; P<.001), higher parity (AOR 2.73, 95% CI 2.12-3.50; P<.001), lower wealth quintiles (AOR 4.04, 95% CI 3.02-5.41; P<.001), and rural residence (AOR 1.40, 95% CI 1.18-1.67; P<.001). Protective factors included older maternal age at delivery (AOR 0.56, 95% CI 0.42-0.74; P<.001) and history of ever-terminated pregnancy (AOR 0.74, 95% CI 0.63-0.86; P<.001). Significant temporal interactions (all P<.05) indicated that the strength of associations for education, parity, religion, wealth, media exposure, health care access barriers, residence, and pregnancy desire differed between survey rounds, reflecting changing determinants of CoC engagement amid policy reforms and pandemic disruptions. Conclusions: Maternal, socioeconomic, and geographic factors are strongly associated with discontinuity along the maternal health care continuum in Bangladesh. Statistically significant temporal variations underscore the impact of evolving health policies and system disruptions on maternal service utilization patterns. Targeted, area-specific interventions addressing these determinants across all CoC components are essential to improve maternal health care retention and achieve better maternal and child health outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.071

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Public Health and Surveillance→Same topicGlobal Maternal and Child Health→French-language works237,207→