MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7131864400 · doi:10.48336/95

Petroglyphs on the periphery: the landscapes of rock art in the Canadian Maritimes

2025· other· en· W7131864400 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bryn Tapper

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRock artArchaeological recordWoodlandPeninsulaColonialismNova scotiaDeep timeClimate change

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dissertation offers a regional overview of traditions of rock art created by ancestral Mi’kmaq, Wolastoqiyik, and Peskotomuhkatiyik in the Canadian Maritime provinces of Nova Scotia and New Brunswick. Specifically, it examines the changing roles of rock art across the boundary of European Contact, identifying similarities and differences in content, style, and landscape placement between pre- and postcontact traditions (and including comparisons with mobile art). Evidence for precontact rock art is limited, restricted to a single Late Woodland site in southern New Brunswick, yet it marks the eastern limit of rock art traditions, often associated with ritual specialists, recorded among Algonquian-speaking peoples stretching across the Canadian Shield, and extending from the Great Lakes to eastern Maine. Most rock art was made between the 17th and early 20th centuries, and the majority of that, during the 18th and 19th centuries. Analysis of the content, style, distribution, and archaeological and historical contexts of 12 postcontact sites reveals not only continuity with precontact traditions, but, increasingly, a greater concern with recording the changing circumstances of Mi’kmaw, Wolastoqey and Peskotomuhkati individuals and communities as they adapted to the challenges imposed and opportunities afforded by culture contact during the colonial period. Significantly, the authorship of petroglyphs appears to have broadened, and although the practice was rooted in precontact pictographic traditions, it was just one facet of a wider ‘pictographic literacy’ expressed across various media. Reflecting a broader suite of concerns than found in precontact traditions, much postcontact rock art relates to the social, economic, political and religious lives of men and women as they sought to retain access to hunting, gathering, and fishing territories and resources, negotiate the introduction of Christianity, adopt new technologies, and diversify their economies. The geographic distribution of postcontact rock art also reflects the impact of European settler colonialism, and the marginalisation and dislocation of Indigenous communities from ancestral territories, and their subsequent removal to reservations or else places located at the margins of the Euro-settler world. In these peripheral places, petroglyphs were markers of continued Indigenous presence, of individual and collective experience and memory, and represent a form of passive resistance to the assimilation and acculturation policies of successive colonial and, later, provincial governments. Today, rock art plays a significant and dynamic role in the revitalisation of cultural memory and identity for contemporary Mi’kmaq, Wolastoqiyik, and Peskotomuhkatiyik.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.288

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0060.009
Science and technology studies0.0210.012
Scholarly communication0.0080.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→French-language works237,207→