MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7131920000

Development of a sensor testbed for Maritime Autonomous Surface Ship situational awareness

2025· article· en· W7131920000 on OpenAlexfundvenueaboutno aff
Robert Gash, Kevin Murrant, Jason Mills

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMaritime Navigation and Safety
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTransport Canada
KeywordsTestbedSoftware deploymentContext (archaeology)Unmanned surface vehicleAutomotive industrySituation awarenessPort (circuit theory)Hull
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The National Research Council of Canada's Ocean, Coastal and River Engineering Research Centre (NRC-OCRE) and Automotive and Surface Transportation Centre (NRC-AST), along with Transport Canada's Innovation Centre (TC-IC), have been collaborating over the past three years to develop systems and methodologies for investigating sensor performance on marine vehicles. A large portion of this effort has been dedicated to the development of a so-called “Maritime Autonomous Surface Ship (MASS) Sensor Testbed” - a platform for evaluation of various sensors utilized for marine vehicle situational awareness, particularly in the context of harsh environmental conditions. Equipment suitable for deployment on model-scale and full-scale vessels in harsh environments was developed, and was deployed on a physical model-scale Offshore Supply Vessel and on a 5.5-meter Rigid Hull Inflatable Boat (RHIB) designed for autonomous surface research and development. Tank tests were performed in 2021 with a model-scale sensor testbed that informed the development of a full-scale sensor testbed. In 2024 and 2025, field trials were conducted in varying environmental conditions near port infrastructure while docking and maneuvering both in isolation as well as in coordination with an additional autonomous vessel platform (also capturing sensor data).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.526
Threshold uncertainty score0.373

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicMaritime Navigation and SafetyFrench-language works237,207