MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7131920686

Physical modeling supporting design and construction of low crested breakwater for the Ayia Napa Marina, Cyprus

2018· article· en· W7131920686 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Mauricio Wesson, Mitchel Provan, Jack Cox, Paul Knox

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCoastal and Marine Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBermBreakwaterShoreIntertidal zoneCrestScale (ratio)HarbourSeawallEnclosure
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SmithGroupJJR undertook the design a new marina and accompanying land development at Ayia Napa, Cyprus. The marina features a 600-slip mega-yacht harbour framed by a large shoreline protection scheme comprised of wave absorbing block walls, revetments, breakwaters, and pocket beaches. Significant upland development, including two, 25-story towers and residential villas are also included in the design, with some of the new development near the sheltering breakwater. An innovative onekilometer long, low-crested breakwater with tetrapod armor and a wide rock berm was designed to protect the harbor and land development. One of the primary design goals was maintaining a crest height low enough to provide the villa owners and marina users with unobstructed views of the sea. Therefore, a key element in the design was to limit the amount of wave overtopping that could pass over the low crested structure and potentially threaten the villas, yachts, cars and people on the lee side of the breakwater. The maximum overtopping flow rate was of interest rather than the mean time-averaged flowrate, since the maximum flow rate is more closely linked to risks to people and property. A physical model study of a revised breakwater design was carried out at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC). A two-dimensional physical model of an idealized foreshore at the project site was constructed at a geometric scale of 1:42.2 in a 63m long by 1.22m wide wave flume. Scale models of two breakwater cross-sections (one in shallow water, the other in deeper water), due to the variable bathymetry, were constructed and exposed to scaled reproductions of the design-wave conditions forecast for the site. The physical model provided a good simulation of the important hydrodynamic processes influencing the stability and overtopping of the tetrapod armor layer, including nearshore wave transformation, wave breaking, wave run-up, and interstitial flows through the armor and filter layers. The Ayia Napa breakwater is currently under construction, with approximately 50% of the breakwater constructed to date and completion expected by April 2019. Breakwater construction has been closely supervised, assuring that it meets the conditions specified by the design and observed in the physical model. The innovative double berm, low crested design approach of the Ayia Napa Marina breakwater provides a casebook example of how to achieve a harmonic, high-performance breakwater integrated with its landscape and environmental context, as well as highlighting the value of using a physical model to deal with design changes that arise during construction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.099

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicCoastal and Marine DynamicsFrench-language works237,207