MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7131962078

Electron-beam patterning of cobalt fluoride on 10-nm length scale

2001· article· en· W7131962078 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M. Malac, Y. C. Zhu, M. A. Schofield

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCobaltTransmission electron microscopyElectron holographyNucleationElectron microscopeSubstrate (aquarium)FabricationScanning electron microscopeElectron beam-induced deposition
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electron-beam modification of a precursor material can be utilized to fabricate metallic structures on single-digit nanometer dimensions. Whereas, reliable fabrication of magnetic nanostructures is essential for study of fundamental processes in magnetism, cobalt fluoride (CoF2) precursor is a candidate for such fabrication of magnetic (cobalt) nanostructures. We have studied in situ electron beam patterning of CoF2 using a JEOL 3000F transmission electron microscope. The microscope is equipped with a Gatan Image Filter allowing for electron-energy-loss chemical analysis, and equipped for electron holography for mapping of magnetic fields. Our results on electron beam (<10 nm probe) modification of cobalt fluoride show that electron dose typically of 900 C/cm² is needed for complete removal of fluorine at temperature 570 K. However, cobalt particles about 3 nm in diameter start to form at electron doses on the order of 200 C/cm². Nucleation of cobalt particles initiates at the grain boundaries of the CoF2 precursor. The Co particles grow during exposure resulting, after complete exposure, in structures composed of separated, faceted cobalt particles typically 5 - 15 nm in size. The cobalt particles are either c-axis parallel or perpendicular to the substrate plane. Elevated sample temperature during exposure was necessary to eliminate buildup of microscope-related contamination. Cooling the sample to liquid nitrogen temperature during exposure also resulted in elimination of microscope contamination, but the resulting cobalt structures were composed of individual, separated particles. We believe that the non-continuous nature of the final cobalt structures stems from the surface energetics of high surface energy metal (cobalt) on low surface energy substrate (amorphous carbon). A real-time high-resolution TEM movie of the exposure process will be presented to provide insight to the exposure process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.112
Threshold uncertainty score0.428

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicAdvanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207