Политиката на Великобритания спрямо Канада до 1867 г. - от френска колония към английски доминион.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present article analyses Britain’s policy towards Canada from its acquisition until 1867 – from a French colony to an English dominion. The policy of the British Empire regarding its colonies is strictly specific due to both the different historical periods and the peculiarities of the diverse territories it occupies: economic value, strategic importance, demographic characteristics, and so on. Tracking the combination of these factors through the prism of historical reality helps us to understand the kind of evolution that some of these territorial dependencies undergo within the British Empire, namely from protectorates or colonies to dominions. In this line of thought, the colonies with a considerable array of the white population are of particular interest to researchers of the colonial policy of the British Empire, because they are the bond that explains the emergence and development of the so-called "British Commonwealth" – a modern projection of past colonial and dominion relationships within the aforementioned empire. From this point of view, Canada serves as a unique precedent not only because of the specific policy of Great Britain after the conquest of Canadian territories from the French but also as the prototype of the dominion form of interaction between a colony and a metropolis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".