Bibliographic record
Abstract
U ovome radu prikazan je odnos filozofije i književnosti, odnosno mišljenja i romana Alberta Camusa. Istraživanje pokazuje da je Camus, koji je dobio Nobelovu nagradu za književnost 1957., ujedno i filozof. Filozofija apsurda, pobune i sredozemna misao izravno su utjecale na njegove romane. Analiza najpoznatijeg Camusovog romana Stranac pomoću njegova filozofskog objašnjenja Mita o Sizifu pokazuje da je Stranac apsurdan roman čiji je protagonist apsurdni čovjek. Camusov Stranac nastao je prema njegovom ranom romanu Sretna smrt koji je vrijedna zabilješka začetaka njegove misli koja će se razviti u Pobunjenome čovjeku i zadobiti mjeru. Mersault kao (negativni) pobunjenik još ne poznaje pravu pobunu dok Meursault spoznaje ravnotežu života koju je poremetio. Ovim radom Camusa se određuje kao književnika-filozofa i filozofa-književnika čija je književnost nerazdvojiva od njegove filozofije. Također, želi se doprinijeti revitalizaciji njegove misli.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".