MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132035820

Statistical survey of quasi-periodic VLF emissions observed in the inner magnetosphere conjugated with geomagnetic field fluctuations measured on the ground

2017· article· en· W7132035820 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueASEP · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicEarthquake Detection and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEarth's magnetic fieldMagnetosphereQuasiperiodic functionMagnetometerIntensity (physics)Geomagnetic latitudeMagnetic fieldLatitudeField intensity
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a comparison between properties of quasiperiodic (QP) ELF/VLF \nemissions observed by the low-altitude DEMETER spacecraft and ULF geomagnetic \nfield pulsations measured on the ground by the THEMIS/CARISMA (Canadian Array \nfor Realtime Investigations of Magnetic Activity) system of flux-gate magnetometers \nand by the Sodankyla Geophysical Observatory (SGO) magnetometer. We have \nselected for analysis about 400 QP DEMETER events which were conjugated with \nground-based stations. The analyzed QP events have modulation periods larger than \n10 s and frequency bandwidths higher than 200 Hz.\nA good agreement between modulation periods of QP emissions and frequencies of \nthe most intense fluctuations of ULF pulsations has been found for QP events with \nmodulation periods larger than 40 s. Such QP emissions which appear to be closely \nassociated with coincident geomagnetic pulsations are called QP1, representing \nabout 18 percents of the total number of analyzed QP events. No corresponding \ngeomagnetic pulsations were identified in the remaining 82 percents of QP events, \nand these events are classified as QP2. The maximum spectral intensity of QP1 \nevents does not seem to depend on the intensity of geomagnetic field fluctuations \nwhile QP2 events intensity is increasing with integral intensity of the geomagnetic \nfield fluctuations at frequencies 10 - 500 mHz. The intensity of geomagnetic field \ndisturbances gradually increases with invariant geomagnetic latitudes during QP \nemissions of both types. However, in the case of QP2 type, a rapid rise of \ngeomagnetic field fluctuations was observed in the latitude range of 60 to 65 \ndegrees.\nBased on the observed association between QP emissions and geomagnetic field \ndisturbances, we attempt to estimate the spatial extent of the QP emissions and we \ndiscuss the effect of ULF pulsations of different origin on QP1 emissions in the \nmagnetosphere.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.193
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it