MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132048084

Blossom Hill Hotels & Resorts: Growing and Flourishing

2015· other· W7132048084 on OpenAlexaff
Terence Tsai, Zhihong Xu, MeiHua Su

Bibliographic record

VenueCEIBS Institutional Repository · 2015
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCentre Casa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlourishingTourismGovernment (linguistics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

自20世纪80年代精品酒店进入了中国市场后,它就凭借定制化服务、高端的装修和精准客户群,逐渐为大众所熟知并取得了健康发展。许多知名精品酒店正在通过酒店连锁的方式寻求在中国扩张的机会。鉴于特色精品酒店标准化的过程存在困难,与快捷连锁酒店相比,精品酒店业的扩张速度较为缓慢。花间堂在第一个五年(2009—2014)的发展历程中,寻求其独特的差异化发展,通过老宅与现代设计的完美结合,在各种服务中顾客所感知的浓烈的家的氛围等,在行业中成功立足。然而,花间堂在不同区域组团式发展进程中,因时代转变,在产品、用户、品牌等方面也面临着种种挑战:长远来看,花间堂的特色是否能够坚持做下去?如果要坚持特色,如何平衡差异化与标准化?“组团式”经营模式是否是花间堂的最佳发展模式?花间堂的定价策略又该如何与区域布点相结合?花间堂的核心团队该如何保持持续的创新能力?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.170
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCEIBS Institutional RepositoryFrench-language works237,207