MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132063987

Amarna Period in Egypt

2018· dissertation· hr· W7132063987 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bojan Stojčević

Bibliographic record

VenueRepository of the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Osijek · 2018
Typedissertation
Languagehr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAncient Egypt and Archaeology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeriod (music)Term (time)Nova scotia
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Razdoblje Amarne u Egiptu započinje s faraonom Amenhotepom IV., odnosno preseljenjem egipatske prijestolnice iz Tebe u novoosnovani grad Akhetaton. Amenhotep IV. na prijestolju je naslijedio svoga oca Amenhotepa III. koji mu u naslijeđe ostavlja bogatu i uređenu državu. Nedugo po stupanju na prijestolje Amenhotep IV. dolazi u sukob s Amonovim svećenstvom, zabranjuje štovanje dinastičkog boga Amona te uvodi novu religiju atonizam. Kako bi prekinuo sve veze s bogom Amonom mijenja svoje ime u Ekhnaton te prijestolnicu seli u novoosnovani grad Akhetaton, izgrađen u čast bogu Atonu, koji se nalazi na području današnje Amarne. Amenhotep IV. bio je oženjen kraljicom Nefertiti s kojom je imao šest kćeri. Faraon i njegova obitelj smatrali su se glasnicima boga Atona na zemlji, a faraon je bio taj koji je trebao usaditi nova vjerovanja u srca svojih podanika. Nakon smrti Amenhotepa IV. na tronu su se izmjenjivali vladari koji nisu ostavili dublji trag u egipatskoj povijesti. Mladi faraon Tutankhamon obnovio je štovanje boga Amona i vratio prijestolnicu u Memfis što je označilo kraj nove Amenhotepove religije. Posljednji faraon iz razdoblja Amarne bio je starac Aj, a dolaskom na vlast generala Horemheba završava se razdoblje Amarne. Premda reforme Amenhotepa IV. nisu zaživjele one su svakako bile revolucionarne, kako u religijskom pogledu, tako i u umjetnosti.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.149
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.012
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRepository of the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences OsijekSame topicAncient Egypt and ArchaeologyFrench-language works237,207