MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132084535

The Effect of Electromagnetic Fields on Dogs Diagnosed with Mild to Moderate Hip Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Placebo Controlled Retrospective Study

2025· article· en· W7132084535 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ajanta Alexandra Basak, Marija Ivaškienė

Bibliographic record

VenueLithuanian University of Health Sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicVeterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteoarthritisBlood pressurePlaceboRandomized controlled trialRetrospective cohort studyHeart rate
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: It is estimated that 25%-33% of dogs are affected by osteoarthritis (1). The hips are a major joint affected by osteoarthritis (2). The Assisi Loop 2.0®, a pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (PEMF) device, is a non-invasive therapy that emits current pulsed generated magnetic field pulses over a short period of time to living tissue (3). PEMF devices aid in the upregulation of nitric oxide production leading to a decrease in swelling, inflammation and pain (4). Aim: To investigate PEMF therapy and its effectiveness on treating dogs diagnosed with hip osteoarthritis leading to a better quality of life. Methods: This study was conducted at a clinic in Alberta, Canada between 2024- 2025. Inclusion parameters were: 7-15 years old, body weight ≤25 kg, diagnosed with osteoarthritis (COAST stage 2 or 3), currently on medications and/ or supplements to treat osteoarthritis. Thirty dogs were enrolled in the study. A random number generator was used to divide them into either the experimental or control group. The parameters that were analysed were: breed, age, castrated/ intact, gender, body weight, and BCS. There were two 15-minute treatments a day with the Assisi Loop 2.0® over 14 days. The experimental group received treatments with the Assisi Loop 2.0® on their hips. Heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure MM colour, CRT, rectal temperature, and ROM were measured before and after treatments. On days 1, 7, and 14 the short form Glasgow pain scale was used to access the dog’s pain levels. Results: The experimental group demonstrated a decrease in heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure, and rectal temperature after each treatment with the Assisi Loop 2.0® . The control group’s vital parameters increased after the placement of the inactivated Assisi Loop 2.0® on their hips. In general, there was a noticeable trend for both the standard deviation and standard mean of the experimental group’s vital parameters to be higher than the control group’s vital parameters. As p<0.05, all vital parameters except for blood pressure systolic (p=0.671) and blood pressure diastolic (p=0.052) were statistically significant. The experimental group had decreased Glasgow pain scores at day 7 and 14, 6.47/24 and 5.2/24 respectively and increased ROM after treatments with the Assisi Loop 2.0® . Conclusion: The Assisi Loop 2.0® decreased pain levels and improved quality of life in the dogs in the experimental group. PEMF used in combination with allopathic medicine (pharmacological therapy) to treat osteoarthritis will allow for greater functional capacity and pain relief and may allow for a decrease in the number of medications leading to less adverse side effects. Due to the small number of dogs used in this study it is recommended that future studies include a larger study size.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.450
Threshold uncertainty score0.612

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLithuanian University of Health SciencesSame topicVeterinary Orthopedics and NeurologyFrench-language works237,207