MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132105764

PyTorch-based deep learning approach for real-time network traffic analysis

2023· dissertation· en· W7132105764 on OpenAlex
David Goričanec

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueFH JOANNEUM ePUB · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelevance (law)Process (computing)Deep learningIntrusion detection systemStrengths and weaknessesAnomaly detectionSet (abstract data type)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the internet continues to expand and cyber-attacks become more complex, the area of network intrusion detection (NID) has gained considerable relevance in research. NID describes the process of monitoring and analysing network traffic to identify indicators of unauthorized access, misuse, or any other malicious activity. Various machine learning techniques can automate this process and identify anomalies in network traffic as either normal or anomaly (Bhattacharyya and Kalita, 2013). This thesis focuses on a deep learning-based network intrusion detection model trained using the PyTorch framework with the NSL-KDD dataset. The NSL-KDD dataset is widely recognized and offers a comprehensive set of features. However, given its age and its limited conformity with contemporary real-world networks, this thesis also explores alternative datasets. One significant alternative is the CIC-IDS2017 dataset from the University of New Brunswick's Canadian Institute for Cybersecurity, along with other commercial options. Moreover, the thesis compares the differences and functionality of these datasets regarding accuracy, precision, modernness and ease of use. To facilitate the comparison, the presented paper starts with an introduction and description of machine learning, PyTorch, the NSL-KDD dataset and its implementation and finishes with the description of the alternative datasets. The research significantly enhances the current body of knowledge regarding the utilization of machine learning techniques and provides advantages and disadvantages of machine learning, as well as insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the datasets. Furthermore, it provides strategies for improving their effectiveness and recommendations for future research in this specific area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.645
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it