MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132178607

花间堂:情怀客栈的商业蜕变 Blossom Hill: Metamorphosis of Inns with Nostalgic Sensation

2015· article· W7132178607 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCEIBS Institutional Repository · 2015
Typearticle
Language
FieldPsychology
TopicNostalgia and Consumer Behavior
Canadian institutionsCentre Casa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSensationMetamorphosisPain sensationTaste
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

当张蓓在2010年春天开出花间堂第一家分店——丽江植梦院的时候,这家只有20间客房的小客栈所讲述的故事只是关乎情怀——对于中国式的幸福生活的憧憬梦想。几年过去,凭借独特的设计理念与酒店文化,花间堂迅速成长为国内精品度假酒店领域一块响亮的牌子,源自情怀的生意越做越大。 成立至今,花间堂完成了三件大事:截至2013年10月,基于植梦院模式,花间堂在大丽江地区陆续开出10家分店,成功完成云南的本地复制,实现了打造“丽江客栈第一品牌”的阶段性目标;2012年4月,周庄花间堂开业,成为异地复制的样板,花间堂在华东和西南地区的拓展就此启动,目前两地已建成和建设中的项目有10余个;2014年5月,花间堂第一个度假村落——西溪花间堂完工,从民宿扩大到村落的产品升级战略落地。 在此基础上,张蓓又为花间堂在前期积累的品牌价值与设计运营能力找到了更广的出口。2015年6月,花间堂首个管理输出项目——无锡阳山稼圃集建成。据张蓓估计,2017年花间堂管理输出项目的体量将相当于过去若干年自投自建项目的总和。用张蓓的话说,花间堂2009~2014年所做的事是“养品牌”“建模板”。民宿产品成型,村落产品成型,财务模型被验证,提供后台支撑的总部平台功能不断完善……这些是从0到1再到10的过程。接下来花间堂要做的是,实现从10到100的大步拓展。 http://www.ceibsreview.com/show/index/calssid/28/id/3377

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.212
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it