Destination Helsingør:Helsingør i rejsehistorisk perspektiv, c. 1500-1970
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article examines how the reasons for visiting Elsinore have changed over the centuries and investigates how Elsinore fits into the evolution of travel on a larger scale. Historically, Elsinore has been one of the most visited destinations in Denmark. Erik I founded the town as a destination when he granted its charter in 1426; it was intended to become a town for travelers. The majority of visitors were compelled to come to Elsinore to pay the sound toll, but this institution created a flow of people attracted to the town for its services and industry. Throughout the centuries, migrants, merchants, diplomats, soldiers, artisans, and common folk formed the foundation for the town’s existence. In turn, the many travelers – mainly traveling out of necessity rather than for pleasure – who arrived in Elsinore during the early modern period, unwittingly created a town that itself became an attraction to travelers. The rise of leisure travel almost coincided with the dismantling of the sound toll in 1857. Without the sound toll, the town was in dire need of a new source of income, and the tourists who flocked to the area became a part of the solution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it