MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132180039

Initiative sur le soudage laser à haute productivité, un projet de collaboration multipartite par le groupe de recherche et développement industriel METALTec du CNRC

2021· article· fr· W7132180039 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Fatemeh Mirakhorli, Mélissa Despré, Marie-Christine Gagnon, Julie Menier, Marie-Frédérique Biron, Myriam Poliquin, Geneviève Simard

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser Material Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWeb siteCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)2019-20 coronavirus outbreak
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ces dernières années, les applications en soudage laser sont en constante augmentation dans différentes industries, notamment dans le secteur du transport. Pour augmenter la productivité d'une cellule de soudage laser, un projet de collaboration multipartenaires est défini dans le cadre du groupe industriel de R&D METALTec, qui compte plus de 25 membres et partenaires issus de l’industrie, du milieu académique et des centres de recherche. Le lancement et les progrès de ce projet sont rendus possibles grâce à la collaboration importante de nombreuses femmes, notamment Mélissa Després, chef de programme META; Marie Christine Gagnon, gestionnaire du groupe METALTec; Julie Menier, gestionnaire de projet; Marie-Frédérique Biron, conseillère en contrats stratégiques; Fatemeh Mirakhorli, chercheuse/experte en soudage laser; Myriam Poliquin et Geneviève Simard, agentes techniques ainsi que Lorraine Blais, collaboratrice industrielle. Il importe de mentionner que ce projet est réalisé en collaboration avec plusieurs collègues masculins, notamment François Nadeau, chef technique en fabrication avancée de composantes allégées, et David Prud'homme, chef des relations avec les membres. L'objectif principal de ce projet sera de développer une cellule de soudage laser intelligente pour l’industrie 4.0 en utilisant des systèmes de contrôle multi-capteurs et d'inspection laser ultrasonique en ligne avec des méthodes d'apprentissage machine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.171
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.146 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicLaser Material Processing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207