MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132199655

PhoneWin: Winning in Rural Markets

2018· other· W7132199655 on OpenAlexaff
S. Ramakrishna Velamuri, Yan 龚焱, 赵丽缦

Bibliographic record

VenueCEIBS Institutional Repository · 2018
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCentre Casa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProduction (economics)ProductivityGovernment (linguistics)Rural areaWork (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

江苏华博实业有限公司(简称“江苏华博”)成立于2001年。经过数十年的发展,以手机分销为主业的江苏华博成长为江苏省领先的手机分销商。为了更好地应对企业内、外部的挑战,江苏华博于2013年开始探索如何将传统的线下手机分销业务向线上转型。2014年4月,通过整合线下的“蜂云物流”和线上的“我要订货网”,江苏华博内部成立了江苏蜂云供应链管理有限公司(简称“蜂云网络”)。与当时淘宝和京东等大型电商将主要精力定位在一、二线城市的消费者不同,蜂云网络将战略部署在乡镇一级市场的小店。它最基本的运营模式是:当小店在我要订货网上下单后,蜂云物流会将货物在第二天下午4点之前将货物送至小店。截至2015年11月11日,蜂云网络的业务已拓展至全国13个省,与300多家手机供应商建立了合作关系,在其平台注册的小店数量也超过了8万家。2015年10月,蜂云网络完成了1.2亿元的A轮融资。然而,京东和淘宝等电商平台已纷纷开始部署农村市场。这对蜂云网络无疑是一个巨大的威胁。作为最早进入农村市场的开拓者,蜂云网络能否抵住这些强大的对手所带来的压力?又能否在未来几年保持其收益的持续增长呢?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.130
Threshold uncertainty score0.435

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0150.007
Scholarly communication0.0170.009
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1300.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCEIBS Institutional RepositoryFrench-language works237,207