MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132215605

iNeuro: Technology and Business Model Innovation of EEG Platform

2020· other· W7132215605 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaoming Zhu, Zhijing Cao, Yingzi Ni

Bibliographic record

VenueCEIBS Institutional Repository · 2020
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCentre Casa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusiness modelElectroencephalographyData modelingBusiness process modelingInformation technology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

妞诺科技的创始团队都是脑电领域的研究学者,受科研项目启发开始探索脑电技术商业化的可能性。妞诺最初从脑电图机切入,通过自研硬件的升级取得了一系列医疗器械认证,并逐渐与一些医院建立了合作关系。自主研发的硬件帮助妞诺获取到高质量的脑电数据,再结合团队本身的数据挖掘和分析能力,公司从单一的脑电解决方案供应商逐渐转型为多模态脑科学数据平台。 妞诺科技的创智指的是公司基于医疗器械研发和数据挖掘分析所做的技术创新,创制指的是公司通过细分市场、业务范围和价值主张的调整所做的商业模式创新。 妞诺是如何一步步打造核心竞争力并发展出如今的商业模式的、未来又应该如何发展呢?此外,虽然大数据服务是当下的一个热点,但可持续的盈利点尚不清晰,且妞诺团队的销售经验相对薄弱。目前公司已完成了三轮融资,投资人对于项目回报也有自己的预期,公司下一步走向何方?是继续寻觅投资人、冲刺科创板还是投靠大公司?这些都是创始团队需要考虑的问题。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.841
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCEIBS Institutional RepositoryFrench-language works237,207