MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132297995

Antigal: Brand and Company Value of a Family-Controlled Wine Business

2022· other· en· W7132297995 on OpenAlex
Lucia Pierini, Martin Roll, Gianfranco Siciliano, Zhijing Cao

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCEIBS Institutional Repository · 2022
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCentre Casa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWineryProfit marginProfit (economics)Cash flowLicenseValue (mathematics)Financial analysisDistribution (mathematics)Cash
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

At the end of 2018, Francesco Cartoni was concluding his first MBA term when he decided to start working as an executive assistant for his family company, Antigal Winery (Antigal). Antigal encompassed three companies. Two were based in Mendoza (Argentina): Cepas del Sur S.A., which owned the vineyards, and Botega Antigal S.A., which performed the wine production. The third company, Cork Alliance Inc., was a wine wholesaler and importer/distributor based in Miami, Florida (US), that owned a special license to import alcohol. In past years this company structure allowed Antigal to achieve a wide distribution in the US and gain higher profit margins. However, after Francesco joined the company and decided to expand distribution in China, Antigal’s sales started to grow significantly in Asia as well. Francesco wanted Antigal to have an even greater presence in China, but once he joined the company, he wanted first to have a clear idea about the value of Antigal. Francesco and his siblings spent the following months collecting any relevant information, and with the help of his accounting professor, they started to make an accurate company evaluation. To provide a comprehensive view of Antigal, this case study analyzes the company's past performance. By using financial ratios, common size analysis and trend analysis are performed. Then, to evaluate the company value of Antigal, two evaluation methodologies are applied: (i) Multiples and (ii) Discount Cash Flow (DCF). The case study also shows the limits of these two techniques and proposes alternative methods. In evaluating the company, many issues are considered: What is the best way to evaluate Antigal, which encompasses companies located in different countries? What is the best method to account for the high inflation rate in Argentina? How could global economic trends, such as the burst of the COVID-19 pandemic, and wine industry trends, impact Antigal’s future growth? Antigal recorded stable sales in the United States, and the flow of tourism in Argentina was increasing, also in part due to Chinese tourists. Yet, Francesco wanted China to be one of the leading markets for Antigal. How could his ambition influence Antigal's future strategy and thus its value? The UNO brand was driving Antigal’s sales. Such a brand accounted, on average, for more than 80% of total sales, and UNO was recently recognized as the #7 Malbec wine in the US. What was the value of UNO?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.416
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCEIBS Institutional RepositoryFrench-language works237,207