MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132327668

JYI: The Dilemma of Promoting AI Interview Tools

2023· other· W7132327668 on OpenAlexaff
Hao 赵浩, 钱文颖, 蔺亚男

Bibliographic record

VenueCEIBS Institutional Repository · 2023
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCentre Casa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDilemmaInterviewWork (physics)Perspective (graphical)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

近屿智能是一家以AI视频面试产品为核心的人力资源领域产品和解决方案公司,其创办的初心是希望通过AI技术帮助企业既快又精准地挑选到合适的候选人。然而,在和著名上市公司Y集团的沟通中了解到,Y集团对AI面试产品有诸多疑虑并提出严重质疑,近屿智能创始人方小雷和他的团队遇到了挑战:如何说服Y集团采购其产品?AI面试到底行得通吗? 案例首先介绍了公司和行业背景,包括创始人方小雷的个人经历及其开发AI面试产品的初衷、AI在HR SaaS行业的应用、近屿智能的主要竞争对手。其次,案例描写近屿智能主要产品“AI得贤招聘官”从研发到市场的三次技术迭代;针对不同行业的客户打磨产品、完善服务流程。最后,案例介绍了近屿智能在Y集团遇到的难题:客户对AI面试产品的疑虑和质疑、竞争对手的搅局等。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.082
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.132
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.436

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0820.132
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.006
Science and technology studies0.0190.051
Scholarly communication0.0350.047
Open science0.0050.017
Research integrity0.0060.015
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCEIBS Institutional RepositoryFrench-language works237,207