The Influence of Concentration by a Membrane Process of Reverse Osmosis on the Aroma Compounds of Conventional and Organic Cabernet Sauvignon Wine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Membranskim procesom reverzne osmoze pri različitim procesnim parametrima (tlak i temperatura) dobiveni su koncentrati s različitim sadržajem aromatičnih tvari u uzorcima ekološkog i konvencijalnog vina Cabernet Sauvignon. Proces koncentriranja proveo se pri tlakovima od 25, 35, 45 i 55 bara s primjenom i bez primjene hlađenja, na laboratorijskom uređaju LabUnit M20 s pločama i okvirima, primjenom kompozitnih membrana tipa Alfa Laval RO98pHt. Kvantitativni udio aromatičnih sastojaka odredio se primjenom instrumentalne plinske kromatografije i mikroekstrakcije na čvrstoj fazi (SPME). Dobiveni rezultati ukazuju na to da je veće zadržavanje aromatičnih sastojaka pri višim procesnim tlakovima (55 bara) i to s primjenom hlađenja. Način proizvodnje vina također utječe na količinu aromatičnih sastojaka zadržanih u koncentratu te je dokazano da je veća koncentracija aromatskih nota karakterističnih za ovu sortu grožđa u koncentratima dobivenim iz ekološki proizvedenog vina u odnosu na koncentrate iz konvencijalno proizvedenog vina.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".