MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132369918

The Crazy Yang Bros (C): Innovating with a New Crowdsourcing Platform

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCEIBS Institutional Repository · 2024
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCentre Casa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrowdsourcingKey (lock)The InternetWork (physics)Automation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

本系列案例深入剖析了“疯狂小杨哥”的商业模式创新历程,由A、B、C三个子案例组成。 A案例描述了小杨哥从搞笑短视频主播成功转型为带货主播,并最终成为抖音平台首个拥有超过一亿粉丝的带货达人的故事。然而,随着小杨哥的流量和商业价值不断攀升,出现了一些剪辑师,他们将小杨哥的直播视频剪辑成各种短视频,然后通过自己的网络账号传播,试图从中牟利,导致了一些消费者的混淆和困惑。面对这些未经授权的切片账号,小杨哥将如何应对? B案例展示了小杨哥的解决方式,即为视频剪辑者提供授权,从而探索了直播切片分销市场。这一商业模式创新不仅增加了小杨哥的收益,还使剪辑师、消费者等各方获益。然而,随着授权账号的增多,直播切片市场逐渐出现“内卷”现象。小杨哥应该如何应对这一问题? C案例介绍了小杨哥创立众小二平台,采用新的商业模式创新来解决直播切片市场的“内卷”问题。众小二平台吸引了大量直播切片剪辑师与主播达人进行合作,也规范了直播切片市场,为小杨哥及利益相关者带来了许多好处。然而,这也引发了一系列质疑,如激烈的竞争和产品安全等。由此引发了对众小二未来发展的思考:小杨哥如何找到一条可持续发展之道,以扩大“众小二”这块蛋糕? 本案例展示了小杨哥的三次商业模式创新过程,以及其中的利益相关者格局的变化。这个过程环环相扣,层层递进,每一轮商业模式创新都出现了问题,随后又用新的创新方法巧妙地解决。通过商业模式创新,小杨哥不断增加了总体价值,使所有利益相关者受益,是一个值得学习和借鉴的案例。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.442
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCEIBS Institutional RepositoryFrench-language works237,207