MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7132370006

Effect of climate change on frost penetration depth in the subgrade soil beneath railway tracks: case study

2021· article· en· W7132370006 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
M. Roustaei, M. Hendry, A. Roghani

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Research Council CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaInfrastructure CanadaTransport Canada
KeywordsFrost heavingFrost (temperature)SubgradeClimate changeFrost weatheringGlobal warming
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Frost heave along Canadian railways is a common issue that can result in track geometry issues and reductions in train speeds and rail traffic capacity. This study was conducted at a location prone to frost heave on VIA Rail Canada’s Smith Falls subdivision to determine the maximum frost penetration depth at this site during the last 20 years and explore a correlation between frost depth and weather conditions for future anticipation of frost depth. The results include frost depth fluctuations over the last 20 winters using a thermal analysis conducted by TEMP/W, a regression between weather data and frost penetration depth, and predicted frost depth for the next 75 years based on a high greenhouse gas climate model. The results showed that frost depths estimated using conventional methods and numerical analysis were significantly different and the maximum frost depth tends to decrease in the future but it will be within the frost susceptible layers and could still be problematic at this site. So further monitoring or actions might be needed to prevent frost heave and consequent thaw softening at this location.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.642
Threshold uncertainty score0.719

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARC→Same topicClimate change and permafrost→French-language works237,207→