← Back to cohort
Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
Bibliographic record
VenueRUNG · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFP7 People: Marie-Curie ActionsLaboratory Directed Research and DevelopmentDivision of Human Resource DevelopmentInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesLabex UnivEarthSAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónMarsden FundEuropean Regional Development FundNational Institutes of Natural SciencesIsraeli Centers for Research ExcellenceAustralian Antarctic DivisionJapan Aerospace Exploration AgencyAgencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y TecnológicaScience and Engineering Research BoardJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaHelmholtz Alliance for Astroparticle PhysicsConseil Régional d'AlsaceIstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareLeibniz-GemeinschaftUniversity of NamibiaMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações e ComunicaçõesConseil Régional Provence-Alpes-Côte d'AzurStockholms UniversitetRussian Science FoundationMinistry of Education, IndiaUnitatea Executiva pentru Finantarea Invatamantului Superior, a Cercetarii, Dezvoltarii si InovariiFinanciadora de Estudos e ProjetosDanmarks GrundforskningsfondVetenskapsrådetCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueGovern de les Illes BalearsNational Commission on Research, Science and TechnologyMax-Planck-GesellschaftLiverpool John Moores UniversityIsrael Science FoundationComunidad de MadridHungarian Scientific Research FundAustralian Research CouncilGeneralitat ValencianaConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y TecnologíaCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesBeijing Normal UniversityFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaCompute CanadaRussian Foundation for Basic ResearchUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonUniversiteit van AmsterdamRegione Autonoma della SardegnaConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y TécnicasDirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoAustrian Science FundUniversities Space Research AssociationGrantová Agentura České RepublikyHintze Family Charitable FoundationCurtin University of TechnologyDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftTsinghua UniversityNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekChinese Academy of SciencesInoue Foundation for ScienceTata Institute of Fundamental ResearchCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloNational Radio Astronomy ObservatoryEuropean CommissionKnut och Alice Wallenbergs StiftelseScottish Funding CouncilUK Space AgencyRoyal SocietyUniversity of ManchesterBelgian Federal Science Policy OfficeBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungUniversity of AdelaideInstitut des Origines de LyonFundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de JaneiroCalifornia Institute of TechnologyU.S. Department of EnergyUniversity of New South WalesOffice of Naval ResearchSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungBenemérita Universidad Autónoma de PueblaEGI FederationLos Alamos National LaboratoryStichting voor Fundamenteel Onderzoek der MaterieChina National Space AdministrationXunta de GaliciaStrongGoddard Space Flight CenterFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekTexas Tech UniversityWestern Canada Research GridKorea Astronomy and Space Science InstituteAstronomy Australia LimitedNational Central UniversityMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadOffice of Polar ProgramsARC Centre of Excellence for All-Sky AstrophysicsMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyPolarforskningssekretariatetNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaJavna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RSNational Research FoundationAix-Marseille UniversitéCouncil of Scientific and Industrial Research, IndiaConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoFonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRSUniverzita Karlova v PrazeSan Diego State UniversityVillum FondenNorthwestern UniversityAgence Nationale de la RechercheMinistero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della RicercaVlaamse regeringAustralian GovernmentU.S. Naval Research LaboratoryGrainger FoundationAutoritatea Natională pentru Cercetare StiintificăNational Research Foundation of KoreaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaScottish Universities Physics AlliancePlanning and Budgeting Committee of the Council for Higher Education of IsraelNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoNational Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of SciencesIstituto Nazionale di AstrofisicaUniversity of Wisconsin-MilwaukeeNanjing UniversityMinisterie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en WetenschapWeizmann Institute of ScienceAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungScience Foundation IrelandNational Science Foundation
KeywordsNeutron starBinary numberBinary starX-ray binaryStar (game theory)
DOInot available
Abstract
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Observational | low |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Bench or experimental | high |
models splitAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.977
Threshold uncertainty score0.215
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itQuick stats
Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractno