MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132422684

Grand Resort Bad Ragaz (A): Business Model Innovation in Wellness Tourism Industry

2021· other· W7132422684 on OpenAlexaff
张文清, 薛文婷, Katherine Rong 忻榕

Bibliographic record

VenueCEIBS Institutional Repository · 2021
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCentre Casa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusiness modelTourismWork (physics)Government (linguistics)Tourist industryRevenue model
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

康健旅游已然在全球旅游业掀起一股潮流。据全球康健组织统计,康健旅游这一细分市场正在快速增长,2015-2017三年间,这一市场年均增速为6.5%,是全球旅游业市场的两倍以上。在欧洲,瑞士以阿尔卑斯山的美景和前卫文化闻名全球。在阿尔卑斯山麓脚下,坐落着一处低调的奢华景点——巴德拉德兹大饭店。饭店内有一处发现于800多年前的泉眼,至今仍在涌出与体温相当的天然SPA温泉水。泉眼周围是宁静的风景区,几百年来,这里一直存在着温泉疗养的传统,使这一地点成为欧洲第一的康健和疗养胜地。集团旗下的医疗中心甚至成为了官方认证的瑞士奥林匹克医疗中心。巴德拉德兹集团有机地将家族企业与瑞士独创元素结合在公司战略中,一方面,所有集团层面的决策都以保护温泉为前提,另一方面集团也在以积极和创造性的心态探索商业机会。相较于财务报表,公司更重视顾客体验,同时跨部门协作也是公司在运营方面的一项重要考量。在这种创新导向的管理哲学驱动下,巴德拉德兹集团为人们提供包括顶级酒店体验,米其林星级餐厅,医疗中心,SPA水浴,高尔夫,运动场甚至赌场在内的一站式服务。然而,巴德拉德兹集团也认识到了欧洲人口老龄化和激烈竞争所带来的潜在风险。因此,集团高层开始考虑将重点客户定位从可将费用通过保险报销的短途游客,转向自费的长途游客。目前,大多数游客都是短途游客。哪个群体应成为集团的主要目标客户群?是客户基数较大的短途游客,还是支付意愿更强的自费游客?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.672
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.011
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0070.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCEIBS Institutional RepositoryFrench-language works237,207