Част от колективна находка с талери от втората половина на XVIII - първата половина на XIX век, намерена в района на село Световрачене, Софийско
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A portion of a hoard consisting of 59 silver thalers discovered in the lands of the village of Svetovrachene near Sofia is published here. The coins are housed in the numismatic depot of the National History Museum - Sofia. They are of two types. The first represents convention thalers of the Habsburg emperors Maria Theresia, Franc II and Francisc I (a total of 38 pieces), as well as one piece each of the Duke Maximilian III Joseph of Bavaria and King Frederick Augustus I of Saxony. The second comprises thalers (coins of 8 reales), the so-called columnarios of the Spanish kings Charles III, Charles IV, and Ferdinand VII struck in the Spanish possessions in America - Mexico, Bolivia and Peru. These two types of thalers were the most widespread Western silver coins of a high denomination in money circulation in the Bulgarian lands from the second half of the 18th - first half of the 19th c. As attested in the written sources, they circulated freely in the markets of the Ottoman Empire and were willingly accepted as a means of payment by the local population. That was due to their fine manufacture and the high purity of the silver alloys from which they were made. Thus, they contrasted with the "domestic" Ottoman silver coins and therefore, they were preferred for hoarding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.034 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".