MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132544166

Luda Technology and Shanghai Railway Bureau: Confidential Information of Luda Technology Negotiation Participants (A)

Xijia Su, Jieping Chen, Yu Chul Yang, Jianhua Zhu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCEIBS Institutional Repository · 2013
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCentre Casa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConfidentialityNegotiationInformation technologyKey (lock)Work (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

2012 年春节过后,路达科技股份有限公司(以下简称“路达”)的副总赵懋庭接到了上海铁路局对外合作项目主管张博通的电话,要求迅速完成在商场、地铁和超市推出自助售票设备的谈判。路达与上海铁路局就该项目的谈判已持续了三年多,但进展缓慢。A案例从路达赵懋庭的角度出发,为了在谈判中能达到目的并维护底线,路达围绕着价格、选址、技术实现和衍生品设立议题,并拟定出可能的谈判结果。B案例从铁路局张博通的角度出发。张博通也列出了与路达类似的议题,只是因为安全是铁路最主要的追求,所以,他的重点议题是技术实现,其次才是价格、选址和衍生产品。由于双方立场不同,他们分别在不同的可能谈判结果上给出了截然不同的权重比分。双方都希望能按照自己的计划表,实现目的维护底线。这个案例涉及如何进行谈判的问题。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.770
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0080.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.008
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCEIBS Institutional RepositoryFrench-language works237,207