MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132563573

Ant Forest: Starting from Environmental Protection

2021· other· W7132563573 on OpenAlexaff
Meng 芮萌, 朱琼

Bibliographic record

VenueCEIBS Institutional Repository · 2021
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCentre Casa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiodiversitySustainability
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

本案例描述了蚂蚁森林的运营模式及取得的阶段性成果。蚂蚁森林不仅创造了环保公益新模式,还为支付宝及其母公司蚂蚁金服创造了独特的商业价值。第一,它搭建了一个人人可参与的平台,让“看得见的绿色”(种树)与“看不见的绿色”(低碳生活)构成相互激励闭环。第二,它用环保公益由头,吸引用户借助支付宝实现低碳应用,由此弥补了支付宝社交短板,提升了用户使用支付宝的频次,增强了支付宝对用户的黏性;同时,落实了蚂蚁金服绿色金融战略的重要内容——建立个人碳账户;另外,通过生态扶贫行动,蚂蚁森林还为阿里巴巴电商平台输送了多种绿色生态商品。不过,截至2020年年初,蚂蚁森林平台主要还是依靠蚂蚁金服的投资来运营,这让其产品经理祖望感到挑战颇大:蚂蚁森林是否能实现自主持续增长?应该如何打造自主可持续的公益平台?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.144

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.010
Scholarly communication0.0100.009
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCEIBS Institutional RepositoryFrench-language works237,207