MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132572304

Better Life Supermarket: Digital Transformation through Distributed Empowerment

2022· other· W7132572304 on OpenAlexaff
Yuhchang 黄钰昌, 钱文颖, Weiru 陈威如

Bibliographic record

VenueCEIBS Institutional Repository · 2022
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCentre Casa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigital transformationEmpowermentContext (archaeology)Digital divideTransformation (genetics)Set (abstract data type)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

本案例主要介绍了连锁超市步步高的数字化转型探索以及在实施数字化转型时面临的挑战,折射出中国传统零售商中集体的困境,本案例特别强调了激励机制的协同对于一家传统企业顺利推动数字化转型的重要性。 步步高作为中国本土的连锁超市,2017年开始数字化转型的探索。它选择从线下门店开始切入,通过数字化手段逐个击破了线下门店运营中的痛点问题,还做到了对员工工作的可衡量、可评估。员工只要在步步高研发的一款移动端门店管理系统工具下工作,就能实现运营效率的大幅提升。但门店员工没有意愿配合,数字化工具形同虚设,试点门店业绩也没有提升。面对数字化转型过程中“人”的挑战,步步高导入了激励机制的协同。步步高通过合伙人制3.0中对基层员工提成和超额奖金的激励,配合“动态用工”的数字化工具,激活了基层员工的积极性;通过合伙人制4.0中店长参与跟投的设计,激活了门店店长的积极性。在激励机制的协同之下,步步高的数字化转型得到了快速推动,数字化试点门店的利润实现了大幅增长。但步步高的数字化转型还有很多的挑战,比如零售环境的进一步变化、比如公司中台、后台部门对前台员工分享利润的不满……接下来,步步高应该如何应对挑战呢?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.103

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0110.020
Scholarly communication0.0200.024
Open science0.0020.008
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCEIBS Institutional RepositoryFrench-language works237,207