MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132607682

The impact of physiotherapy and electrical stimulation for patients with spinal disc herniation.

2017· dissertation· lt· W7132607682 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Voitiulevič, Andrej,

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Repository of Utenos kolegija Higher Education Institution · 2017
Typedissertation
Languagelt
FieldMedicine
TopicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLow back painRehabilitationTrunkVisual analogue scaleBack painTest (biology)ElectrotherapyPopulationNeck pain
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Relevance of the topic. According to Eurostat 2011 data in Europe the most frequently reported longstanding health problem was a problem with the back and neck about 8,4% (in Lithuania – 7,1%). European Working Condition (1996) found that 30% of all workers in Europe suffer back pain, and it is the most common of all the registered work-related injury. WHO in 2003 publish that 80% of the population will experience a back problem at same time in their lives. Physical therapy is one of the most important in rehabilitation (Paknys, 2011). In the treatment of back pain, often forgotten electrical and nerve stimulation, which often greatly reduces amount of drugs used to relive pain (Kriščiūnas ir kt., 2016). The final work object – The impact of physiotherapy and electric stimulation for patients with spinal disc herniation. The aim of work – to evaluate impact of physiotherapy and electric stimulation for patients with spinal disc herniation. Characteristics of the study. This study was conducted February – May 2017 in UAB „Sveikatos centras Gemma“. The study involved 20 subjects, who have been diagnosed spinal disc herniation. Subject were randomly divided into two groups. In group I electrical stimulation was applied before physiotherapy, group II – after physiotherapy, with this parameters: pulse frequency – 80 Hz, pulse width – 120 μs, time – 20 min. this study conducted using the following test methods: trunk endurance test (McGill), visual analog pain scale , straight leg test. Results of the study led to the main conclusions: evaluating both groups impact of physiotherapy and electric stimulation for patients with spinal disc herniation, data show that pain, functional status and trunk endurance increase in both groups. Comparing the two groups, the results showed that the static trunk muscle endurance results were better in first group, but there was very insignificant difference of pain and functional condition indicators between the groups. The practical significance of the results and application possibilities indicates that data from this study maybe useful for rehabilitation improving the quality of service.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.259
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstitutional Repository of Utenos kolegija Higher Education InstitutionSame topicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationFrench-language works237,207