MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132654623

Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital: Challenges in Diabetes Care Equalization

2024· other· W7132654623 on OpenAlexaff
朱晓明, 刘耿, 朱奕帆

Bibliographic record

VenueCEIBS Institutional Repository · 2024
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCentre Casa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiabetes mellitusEqualization (audio)Primary careMEDLINEHealth care
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

上海市第六人民医院前院长贾伟平从医43年,一直致力于糖尿病精准诊疗、预警筛查、发病机制的研究及防治工程管理。案例按照从小到大、从局部到全局的顺序,讲述贾伟平从糖尿病的尖端科研开始,走通从个体诊治到群体防控的道路,从上海最基层的社区出发,进而覆盖上海全市,进而走向全国,领导中国基层糖尿病的防治管理工作,走通从大城市到县乡村的医防融合的同质化道路。案例着重描述了数字技术在普惠医疗实现过程中扮演的角色。 2021年11月,贾伟平当选中国工程院院士,感觉到更大的责任,她在思考如何利用好院士这个更高更广阔的舞台,将已被实践验证的模式推广到更需要的中国广大基层。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.155
Threshold uncertainty score0.309

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0090.004
Scholarly communication0.0140.004
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCEIBS Institutional RepositoryFrench-language works237,207