MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132669493

Study of Knowledge about Breastfeeding among Expectant Mothers.

2016· dissertation· lt· W7132669493 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jasiūnienė, Jūratė,

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Repository of Utenos kolegija Higher Education Institution · 2016
Typedissertation
Languagelt
FieldMedicine
TopicBreastfeeding Practices and Influences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreastfeedingBreast feedingPromotion (chess)Quarter (Canadian coin)Breast milkPublic healthDuration (music)Breastfeeding promotionStatistical analysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quantitative research was carried out seeking to assess the knowledge about breastfeeding among expectant mothers. Breastfeeding promotion is defined by WHO as an exclusively important task in health care to improve mother’s and infant’s health. As it is proved by scientific research performed in Lithuania and in the world, one of the most important factors making impact on nursing and its duration is mother’s knowledge about breastfeeding. Objective of the work – to assess the knowledge about breastfeeding among expectant mothers. Tasks of the work: 1) to analyse the knowledge about nursing and factors inducing lactation among expectant mothers; 2) to elucidate the advantages of breastfeeding from the point of view of expectant mothers; 3) to assess a preparedness of expectant mothers to breast feed their infants. In order to implement the study, theoretical analysis of scientific literature was performed and quantitative research was carried out. 32 expectant mothers attending the Prenatal Clinic at the Public Institution Utena Primary Health Care Centre were questioned in writing. The questionnaire survey was carried out from 04 Nov 2015 to 11 Dec 2015. The method of statistical analysis was used for presentation of the study results. Statistical data analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel. Results of the study showed that most of the respondents know such factors inducing nursing and lactation as free nursing regimen, early first nursing and sufficiently long duration of nursing from one breast but the importance of skin to skin contact is known to hardly more than one quarter of the respondents only. Although most of the respondents know such advantages of breastfeeding as convenience and economic benefit but they do not have sufficient knowledge about the health benefits of breastfeeding for infants and mothers. Moreover, more than 70 percent of mothers-to-be do not understand that a nutritional value of breast milk and infant formulas is different. The study disclosed that expectant mothers are not ready enough to breast feed their infants because they do not have enough knowledge about positive impact of breastfeeding on infant’s and mother’s health, about duration of exclusive breastfeeding and extended breastfeeding recommended by WHO, they wrongly think that fluid intake can affect the amount of breast milk produced.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.421
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstitutional Repository of Utenos kolegija Higher Education InstitutionSame topicBreastfeeding Practices and InfluencesFrench-language works237,207