MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132670290

Hongcun: Tourism Development of an Ancient Village

2022· other· W7132670290 on OpenAlexaff
Meng 芮萌, 陈炳亮

Bibliographic record

VenueCEIBS Institutional Repository · 2022
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCentre Casa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTourismEcotourismGovernment (linguistics)Work (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

本案例描述了宏村开发旅游业的历程。宏村是一个具有800多年历史的古老村落,因历史原因,村中修建有典型的徽派古建筑和独特的水系,风光秀丽。由于地处皖南山区,交通闭塞,经济相对落后,古建筑和民风民俗保存较为完整,宏村具备发展旅游的基础。 宏村先后被多个主体开发过,包括县旅游局、村办旅游企业等,但一直发展的不成功。从事地产开发的黄怒波因招商引资来到宏村,创立了京黟公司,并聘任以赵总为首的管理团队,对宏村进行旅游开发。开发初期涉及村民、游客、村委会、当地政府等多个利益相关方,近些年又增加了新一代宏村人、外地经营者等新的利益方。 作为开发主体的京黟公司该采用何种模式开发宏村的旅游资源?如何处理与利益相关方之间的关系?宏村旅游创造的价值,应该如何在政府、企业、村民三方之间分配呢?本案例主要围绕这些问题展开。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.731
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCEIBS Institutional RepositoryFrench-language works237,207