MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132675464

EAST TIMOR AND ASEAN

2023· article· W7132675464 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Илиян Матеев

Bibliographic record

VenueBulgarian Portal for Open Science · 2023
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIsland Studies and Pacific Affairs
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndonesianIndependence (probability theory)Administration (probate law)PortugueseQuarter (Canadian coin)East AsiaDemocratizationAccession
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: The article examines the development of East Timor from the arrival of the Portuguese to its shores in the first quarter of the 16th century to the present day. At the beginning, the colonial period is briefly presented, during which East Timor was officially ruled by Portugal from 1702 to 1975 (with interruptions from 1812 to 1815, when the entire island of Timor was ruled by Great Britain and from 1942 to 1945, when the colony was occupied by Japan). Attention is then drawn to the period of Indonesian occupation from December 1975 to October 1999, followed by the administration of the United Nations Interim Administration in East Timor from late October 1999 to May 2002. Emphasis is placed on the analysis of the political and economic development of East Timor since the restoration of independence on May 20, 2002 until now. In this regard, special attention is paid to the efforts of the leadership of East Timor, for the country to be accepted as an equal member of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). The accession process is expected to be completed during Indonesia's ASEAN chairmanship in 2023. After the overthrow of Suharto in May 1998, the democratization of Indonesia began, which gradually became one of the biggest supporters of East Timor's admission to the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. At the end of the article, attention is paid to the economy of East Timor and the prospects for its development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.118

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulgarian Portal for Open ScienceSame topicIsland Studies and Pacific AffairsFrench-language works237,207