MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132694125

Lean venture :selected cases on entrepreneurial practices

2019· other· W7132694125 on OpenAlexaff
Yan 龚焱, 钱文颖

Bibliographic record

VenueCEIBS Institutional Repository · 2019
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCentre Casa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)EntrepreneurshipGovernment (linguistics)Field (mathematics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

世界范围内新一轮科技革命和产业变革正在加速演进,人工智能、大数据、云计算、区块链等新兴技术正在快速迭代升级,各个行业都面临着巨变。巨变牵扯着资本潮来潮去,大量的创业企业因为没有及时摸索出盈利模式,运营问题逐渐凸显,而被淘汰出局。 那么,创业企业究竟应该怎么把握变与不变?为了解答这一问题,中欧国际工商学院教授与案例中心对创业企业进行了长期研究,总结出了其在发展过程中会经历的三个阶段:第一个阶段是商业模式的探索,即从0到1;第二个阶段是商业模式的放大和复制,也就是从1到N;第三个阶段是成熟企业转型,寻找新的商业模式,即从N到N+1。 本书精选了生鲜、出行等领域的八个处于不同创业阶段的案例,旨在带领读者了解不同领域、不同阶段下创业企业在运营、管理、战略及组织等方面的特点,希望能够给读者,尤其是创业者带来一点启示,以应对时代变革。本书每篇案例后还配有业界专家点评,解密其中的商业规则,引领读者拓展思路。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0080.006
Scholarly communication0.0090.007
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCEIBS Institutional RepositoryFrench-language works237,207