MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132746028

Development of Climate Adaptation and Asphalt Selection Tool (CAAST)

2023· article· en· W7132746028 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Omran Maadani, Mohammad Shafiee, Juan Hiedra Cobo

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAsphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClimate changeAsphaltAir temperatureSelection (genetic algorithm)Adaptation (eye)Mean radiant temperatureGlobal warmingClimate zones
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces the Climate Adaptation and Asphalt Selection Tool (CAAST), which is a new computer software used to select climate resilient Performance Grade (PG) of asphalt binder for Superior Performing Asphalt Pavements (Superpave) based on extreme high and low pavement temperatures. Developed by National Research Council Canada (NRC), CAAST uses projected climate change temperature data provided by Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) for Canadian cities, obtained from the Canadian Regional Climate Model (CanRCM), version 4, from 1950 to 2100. The CAAST software analyzes the projected temperature data file within a certain time period (i.e.: road design life) to extract and calculate environmental parameters that will be used to assess the impact of climate change and to select the climate resilient asphalt binder performance grade (PG). CAAST incorporated the shortcomings of the existing Long-Term Pavement Performance Bind Online (LTPPBind) such as standing traffic speed, besides slow and fast traffic speed and annual temperature variations in terms of Degree Days (change within a year not only during 6 months). The paper compares and analyzes Superpave PG results obtained from ECCC's projected temperature data via CAAST against the existing method (LTPPBind) based on Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA-2) temperature data. The study shows that the indices such as Mean Annual Lowest Air Temperature (MALAT) and Mean Annual Degree Days (MADD) for cities in Atlantic, Central, Prairies, Western and Northern Canada are significantly higher when using the new proposed method compared to MERRA-2. The analysis also suggests that climate change can induce higher upgrades in high and low PG grades over the next 25 years than those predicted by MERRA-2 via LTPPBind. Consequently, the use of CAAST with embedded projected air temperature data can provide an effective solution for selecting resilient PG binder types in response to climate change, which is an improvement over traditional approaches that rely on historical climate. Overall, this study highlights the importance of considering climate change projections in pavement design and emphasizes the need for tools like CAAST to ensure pavement performance under changing environmental conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicAsphalt Pavement Performance EvaluationFrench-language works237,207