MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7132860722

Evaluating Lipidomic Circuit Modulation in Glaucoma Management

2024· dissertation· W7132860722 on OpenAlexaff
David Jose Mathew

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2024
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicGlaucoma and retinal disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlaucomaNeuroprotectionTrabecular meshworkIntraocular pressureDownregulation and upregulationProstaglandinLipid signalingBimatoprost
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glaucoma, a sight-threatening condition, is primarily characterized by elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). Despite its importance, the relationship between IOP and glaucoma progression is complex. Livne-Bar et al. (2017) unveiled the neuroprotective potential of lipoxins A4 and B4 (LXA4 and LXB4) in experimental glaucoma. To explore this in a clinical context, I evaluated lipidomic profiles in glaucoma patients and made unexpected findings. Out of a panel of lipid mediators and metabolites Arachidonic acid (AA) and LXA4 levels were selectively elevated, contrary to expectations based on LXA4's neuroprotective role. Investigating the influence of glaucoma medications on human trabecular meshwork cells, I found that latanoprost, a common prostaglandin analogue used as a glaucoma treatment to lower IOP, upregulated key lipidomic elements to produce significantly more LXA4. This result was intriguing because both prostaglandins and LXA4 are lipid mediators derived from the same arachidonic acid substrate. Studying untreated glaucoma patients is challenging, as they often initiate medication early. To approximate this circumstance, I developed a novel rodent model of gradual ocular hypertension (gOHT). Unlike previous models, gOHT exhibited minimal inflammation, significant retinal ganglion cell loss, and vision decline. Cytokine profiling distinguished it from other models that have an IOP spike at induction. Interestingly, the lipidomic profile of this model did not reflect the clinical findings of elevated lipoxins; AA levels were not significantly different compared to controls and lipoxin levels were below detection threshold. This confirmed our earlier finding that upregulation of the AA-lipoxin pathway is instead linked to prostaglandin analogue treatment. Further exploration found that LXA4 does not significantly alter IOP. However, targeting the production of endogenous prostaglandins with the COX inhibitor bromfenac reduced latanoprost's IOP-lowering effects. Thus, a dual mechanism has been uncovered for latanoprost actions that induces parallel pathways to 1) reduce IOP via COX-prostaglandin actions, and 2) inhibit proinflammatory signaling and regulate tissue fibrosis. These findings challenge the current understanding of glaucoma treatment, offering avenues for further research and potential therapeutic advancements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicGlaucoma and retinal disorders→French-language works237,207→