MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7132866039

Investigation of lead content in Norway Maple tree rings and soils in the vicinity of a secondary lead smelter in Toronto

2002· dissertation· W7132866039 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Aden A Takar

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2002
Typedissertation
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHeavy metals in environment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLead smeltingLead (geology)Soil waterAceraceaeMapleLead pollutionDeposition (geology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two separate, but complimentary, studies were undertaken to investigate the extent of lead pollution in an urban environment. Changes in xylem lead concentrations in Norway maple (Acer platanoides) trees sampled from three municipal parkland sites in metropolitan Toronto were examined. One site was located less than a kilometer from a major secondary lead smelter, a second located 2 km from the smelter was adjacent to a major expressway, and a third site was chosen approximately 8 km from the smelter. Concentrations of lead in surface soil collected beneath sampled trees were elevated at the site near the smelter compared to the other sites, and the site located adjacent to the expressway had more lead than the third site. Lead concentrations in tree-rings were highest at the site near the smelter followed by the site adjacent to the expressway, and lead levels in trees at the third and furthest site were significantly lower than the other sites. A significant decline of lead in wood formed in the decade before 1977 to the present time was recorded, reflecting changes in lead deposition into the parklands. The results indicate that Norway maple trees can accurately record historical changes of lead in their environment. In a second study, concentrations and total quantities of lead in Norway maple seedling roots, stems and leaves were determined after 10 weeks growth in soils with similar pH but different total and exchangeable lead levels. These soils were collected underneath the trees sampled from the three parklands and a site adjacent to the lead smelter. Roots accumulated most of the lead and its uptake increased as exchangeable lead in the soil increased. Significantly lower concentrations were observed in stems and leaves suggesting that lead was transported and deposited throughout the plant. In all four treatments, leaves had accumulated consistently higher lead levels than stems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.578
Threshold uncertainty score0.840

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicHeavy metals in environment→French-language works237,207→