MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7132866062

Health, social and economic consequences of workplace injury for BC workers and their families

2007· dissertation· W7132866062 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Judy Anne Brown

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2007
Typedissertation
Language
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Health and Safety Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute for Occupational Safety and HealthMinistry of Health, British Columbia
KeywordsLogistic regressionHealth careOccupational safety and healthPopulationHealthcare serviceInjury preventionPoison controlSocial security
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background. This research used the British Columbia Linked Health Database (BCLHD) to examine the following three areas, following a workplace injury: (1) change in healthcare utilization for WCB claimants; (2) change in healthcare utilization for families of WCB claimants; (3) financial and personal consequences injury. Materials and Methods. For 1 and 2, healthcare use five years before and after the injury was examined, relative to the 12-months before a 1994 injury (baseline), for WCB claimants who required time off (lost time---LTs) for their injuries (and their families). Change in use was compared to that of other WCB claimants (no lost time---NLTs) and individuals in the population who were not WCB claimants (non-injured comparisons---NIs). The dependence of these measurements on registration in the BC Medical Service Plan (MSP) and several injury characteristics were examined. For area 3, multiple logistic regression analyses were used to measure three social and economic outcome (residential change, income assistance use and relationship breakup). Group (LT, NLT) and duration of time away from work for LTs (less than 12 weeks and greater than or equal to 12 weeks) were the prime variables of interest. Key Findings. (1) LTs showed increased physician, hospital, and mental healthcare use five years after the injury at a higher rate than the other two groups. These patterns persisted when adjusting for registration in the BC MSP and injury characteristics. (2) For spouses and children, the differences over time and between groups were marginal. (3) LTs were more likely to move to poorer neighbourhoods and to collect income assistance benefits than the NLTs and less likely to experience a relationship break-up. LTs off work for 12 weeks of more were more likely to receive income assistance than those off for less than 12 weeks. Conclusion. For WCB claimants, the consequences of workplace injury extend beyond what is funded by the WCB into the publicly funded healthcare and social systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.320
Threshold uncertainty score0.643

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.530
Teacher spread0.431 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicOccupational Health and Safety Research→French-language works237,207→