MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132867589

Mozart's Orchestral Cantabile Style: Eighteenth-century Origins of String Performance Practices

2015· dissertation· W7132867589 on OpenAlexaffabout
David Ashley Bowser

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2015
Typedissertation
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMusicology and Musical Analysis
Canadian institutionsCanadian University Music Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVibratoStyle (visual arts)String (physics)MusicalSingingTone (literature)MOZARTMusical instrument
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mozart’s Orchestral Cantabile Style: Eighteenth-Century Origins of String Performance Practices David Bowser Doctor of Musical Arts (2015) Graduate Department of Music University of Toronto A stylistic change in mid-eighteenth-century compositions inspired a decidedly lyrical concept of string playing characterized by connected bowing manner, sustained tone and legato phrasing. At the same time, string instruments and particularly bows were adapted to the changing performance style and became standardized. Mozart’s letters and other historical documents suggest that vibrato and portamento were characteristic to some degree of the string performance style of the late eighteenth century. While Roger Norrington contends that vibrato was not a feature of orchestral string performance before the mid-1930s, historical texts, score indications, string teachers and scholars imply that string vibrato saw a longer evolution over centuries. The instrumental cantabile style in Mozart’s music is inspired by the voice and its qualities. Two characteristics have bearing specifically on performance practices of the orchestral string repertoire: the voice possesses an innate sense of connectivity and a natural tendency to vibrate. This study examines compositional style and corresponding performance practices in orchestral string playing in the eighteenth century and traces the evolution of string vibrato into the twentieth century. It explores the stylistic changes during the mid-eighteenth century, tracking the development from old to new styles and the emergence of melody, the origins and development of the High Classical style of Mozart and Haydn, and the implications of this stylistic evolution for eighteenth-century performance practices, especially as they relate to compositions of Mozart. Included are an analysis of historical texts and treatises referring to string vibrato, a survey of current scholarly opinion, and a discussion of string vibrato indications in scores composed in the nineteenth century and early twentieth century. This study examines research on vocal vibrato by vocal scientists and pedagogues while appraising Mozart’s statement that “the voice trembles naturally” and that “people imitate it…on stringed instruments.” Finally, this research addresses Norrington’s claims and investigates indicators of orchestral string vibrato application revealed in archival footage of Bruno Walter conducting in rehearsal, and in early twentieth-century archival films of German, French and British orchestras.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.107
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicMusicology and Musical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207