MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132867674

Do populations of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum across temperate and subtropical areas of the Americas share a common history?

2007· dissertation· W7132867674 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gabriela Malvárez Macedo

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2007
Typedissertation
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant pathogens and resistance mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTemperate climateCoalescent theorySubtropicsSclerotinia sclerotiorumPopulationImmigrationHaplotypePollen
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Isolates of S. sclerotiorum from lettuce, peanut and soybean in South America (SA) were compared with samples from lettuce from California (CA) and Ontario (total 640 isolates). Recombination over the entire population history in SA and CA was evidenced by high diversity, lack of association of markers, and net-like coalescent genealogies of DNA sequences from two loci. In contrast, Ontario samples, like previous samples from North America (NA), Europe and New Zealand, were less diverse and highly clonal, with association of independent markers and little contemporary recombination. All isolates from NA and SA were homothallic; each isolate had both mating type loci. Two new populations were identified, one comprising samples from peanut and lettuce in SA and lettuce in CA and the second comprising samples from lettuce, tomato and eggplant from SA. The coalescent analysis of a combined dataset of the samples in this study and samples from North Carolina, New York, Louisiana, Alberta and Norway from a previous study supported a genealogy with the haplotype with the longest coalescence to the most recent common ancestor from NA samples (North Carolina and Alberta), followed by a haplotype from the SA-California population. Our preferred hypothesis for the origin of the species in the Americas is two introductions, one via Northern European human immigration to NA and the other via Southern European immigration to SA. We suggest that S. sclerotiorum was introduced to California from SA during the Gold Rush, ca. 1850. But where did the species originate? If the species evolved in the Old World, for example in Asia, introduction from Asia to NA or SA is possible, perhaps via Europe. A more ancient, alternative hypothesis is origin of the species in the Americas, with escape from Pleistocene refugia in both the Northern and Southern Hemisphere. This hypothesis is consistent with the relationship of the two oldest haplotypes to the boundaries of Pleistocene glaciation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicPlant pathogens and resistance mechanismsFrench-language works237,207