MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132869398

The Problem with Pertussis: Finding Undetected Pertussis Cases in Electronic Medical Record Primary Care (EMRPC) to Improve Data Accuracy and Burden Estimates

2022· dissertation· W7132869398 on OpenAlex
Shilo Helen McBurney

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2022
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMathematics
TopicCensus and Population Estimation
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioToronto Public Health
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedical recordPublic health surveillancePrimary careElectronic medical recordUnder-reportingElectronic health recordConfidence intervalPublic healthCohortSensitivity (control systems)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pertussis is a reportable disease in many countries and surveillance is essential, but ascertainment bias has limited data accuracy. However, the true extent of bias, and its impact on burden estimates, is unknown. Within this dissertation are three novel studies which aim to evaluate and enhance the accuracy of health data used for pertussis research in Ontario to improve burden estimates which can inform disease surveillance, health interventions, and public health policy.I used a stratified strategy to sample a reference standard from a primary care electronic medical record cohort to minimize partial verification bias while optimizing sensitivity precision. Eight hundred records were abstracted, with 208 (26.0%) definite and 261 (32.6%) possible prevalent pertussis cases. Classifications demonstrated a variety of case severities. During optimization, the predicted width of 95% confidence intervals for sensitivity ranged from 12.4% to 32.8%. I used a cohort-selected cross-sectional design to evaluate pertussis detection algorithms and reasons for lack of detection in a primary care electronic medical record database. The algorithm including all data measures achieved the highest sensitivity at 20.6%. Sensitivity increased to 100% after reclassifying symptom-only cases as non-cases, but the PPV remained low. Age at first episode was significantly associated with detection in half of the tested scenarios, and false negatives often had some history of immunization. I used Chao capture-recapture models to obtain abundance and sensitivity estimates using a dataset comprised of pertussis case report, laboratory, and health administrative data. I compared results between prevalence, incidence, and adjusted false positive case definitions. Findings demonstrated that all sources consistently fail to detect pertussis cases. Estimate validity improved after adjusting for false positives, demonstrating how capture-recapture methods can be adapted to further their utility to epidemiological research when data is biased. This research strives to improve understanding of gaps in pertussis case ascertainment and burden in Ontario while suggesting mitigation strategies. Each separate aim contributes to this effort. High quality data is essential for conducting vaccine research and effectiveness studies, in addition to evaluating immunization programs. As a result, findings from this study can help direct future research and policy towards the design of optimal public health interventions for pertussis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.786
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it