MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7132872291

The Demographic Category as Leaky Gender Boundary: Implications for Women's Reproductive Health

2003· article· en· W7132872291 on OpenAlexaff
Susan A. McDaniel

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSituatedPopulationReproductive healthFraming (construction)Agency (philosophy)ReproductionSocial constructionismCognitive reframing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The project of demography entails both knowledge production and practice. In knowledge production, the focus has been on the statistical study of populations and population change through the processes of fertility, mortality, family formation/dissolution, population aging, migration, and social mobility. Gender and the bodily are clearly integral to the understanding of population change and processes, but deepening feminist conceptualizations of gender have yet to infuse the production of demographic knowledge. As practice, demography informs population policy and the framing of reproductive health issues. The demographic category, variously defined, is situated in, and socially constructed by, the macro-level stance of demography, consistent with development and international agendas, rather than by either women’s agency or the complex sets of power relations and socio-cultural systems that create, or are a consequence of, population structures and changes. Perplexing paradoxes emerge for women’s reproductive health, three of which are examined here: 1) a knowledge production project, the focus of which is women’s bodies in reproduction, adopting categories that skid by women as agents and socio-political actors; 2) a demographic practice that is political in origin (in disseminating ways of life from a culturally and economically dominant part of the world), not incorporating feminist knowledge of power to enhance understanding of reproduction and reproductive health; and 3) in the intersection of knowledge production and practice, not seeing both as active forces in shaping women as reproductive health agents and women as agents shaping demographic change. This paper offers a foundational critique of the demographic category as eclipsing of women’s agency, and proposes that constructive leaks have sprung in the gender boundaries demography has created, leaks that offer openings for enhanced understanding of women’s reproductive health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.082

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0170.069
Scholarly communication0.0140.017
Open science0.0030.012
Research integrity0.0080.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.138
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes→French-language works237,207→