MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132882464

On strongly perforated ordered K0-groups of simple C*-algebras

2003· dissertation· W7132882464 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew S. Toms

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2003
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Operator Algebra Research
Canadian institutionsBibliothèque et Archives nationales du QuébecUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInvariant (physics)Simple (philosophy)Order (exchange)Element (criminal law)Unital
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Much progress has been made on the classification of simple C*-algebras via the Elliott invariant. A key component of this invariant is the K0-group. Thus, the range of this invariant is of interest to the classification project. In the stably finite case, the K0-group is an ordered group. If x is an element of an ordered group ⟨G; G+⟩ such that x ∉ G + but nx ≠ 0 and nx ∈ G+ for some natural number n, we say that G is strongly perforated and call x a perforation element. The sequel establishes the existence of several new, strongly perforated order structures which arise as the ordered K 0-groups of certain simple C*-algebras. These order structures include all previously known strongly perforated order structures arising in this manner. Also proved is the existence of unital *-homomorphisms between simple C*-algebras with strongly perforated ordered K0-groups which preserve perforation elements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicAdvanced Operator Algebra ResearchFrench-language works237,207