MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7132890383

Area-Level Constrained Income, Immigrant Status and Adverse Maternal and Neonatal Birth Outcomes in Ontario, Canada

2023· dissertation· W7132890383 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Jennifer A. Jairam

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2023
Typedissertation
Language
FieldPsychology
TopicMigration, Health and Trauma
Canadian institutionsPublic Health Ontario
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsRelative riskResidencePregnancyImmigrationCohort studyConfidence intervalNeighbourhood (mathematics)Retrospective cohort studyCohort
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Living in low-income neighbourhoods, or being an immigrant, are each associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, little is known about the comparative risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes among immigrant vs. non-immigrant women living in low-income areas. This dissertation is comprised of three original epidemiologic studies of the risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes among women residing exclusively in low-income areas in Ontario, Canada. The studies assessed whether the risk of these outcomes was influenced by maternal migration status, and separately, maternal neighbourhood income upward mobility. Each used a retrospective population-based cohort design, comprising administrative data housed at ICES.The first study compared the risk of severe maternal morbidity and maternal mortality (SMM-M) between immigrant and non-immigrant women residing exclusively within low-income urban neighborhoods. The overall risk of SMM-M was slightly lower among immigrant than non-immigrant women (adjusted relative risk [RR] 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88-0.97). There was heterogeneity in the RR estimates depending on the immigrant source country. The second study compared the risk of severe neonatal morbidity and neonatal mortality (SNM-M) between newborns of immigrant and nonimmigrant women residing exclusively in low-income urban neighbourhoods. Newborns of immigrant women had an overall lower risk of SNM-M than non-immigrant women (adjusted RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.74-0.79), with considerable variation by maternal country of origin and duration of residence in Ontario. The third study included mothers living in low-income urban neighbourhoods, and evaluated their subsequent risk of SMM-M and SNM-M. Those who achieved upward area-level income mobility between 2 consecutive births were compared to those who did not experience such upward mobility. Women who moved to a higher-income area between births had a lower associated risk of SMM-M in their second pregnancy, compared to those who remained in low-income areas between births (adjusted RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.93). A similar effect was seen for their newborns, who also experienced a lower associated risk of SNM-M (adjusted RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.95) Together, these findings make a substantial contribution towards the understanding of adverse maternal and neonatal birth outcomes among women residing exclusively in lowest-income urban neighbourhoods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.341

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicMigration, Health and Trauma→French-language works237,207→