MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132890780

Queer Reproduction

2023· dissertation· W7132890780 on OpenAlexaff
Noy Naaman

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2023
Typedissertation
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFeminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQueerSubversionRhetorical questionReproductionScholarshipQueer theory
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dissertation foregrounds queer engagement with the law as it pertains to human reproduction in the twenty-first century, entreating us to reassess how our understandings of law and queer intersect. The work proceeds in three parts, each one synthesizing and developing a series of analytical principles from queer scholarship around three objects of research—borders, time, and affect—to critically analyze different aspects of reproductive rights: from access to assisted reproductive technologies; to parental determination in families where children are conceived through such technologies; and the threshold between life and death, where birth and mortality meet. Two broad propositions are advanced through this analysis. The first is that intangible aspects of our social lives—mobility through and against borders, temporality, and affective embodiments—do not function in the background but form the very medium through which the constitutive role of the law, as it pertains to individuals’ mindsets, meaning-making, and institutionalized power-structures, is activated. Notably, borders, time, and affect become the conditions under which legal possibilities are opened or foreclosed, while providing insights into how legal structures—regulatory avenues, rights reasoning, and rhetorical strategies—could be more responsive to the nuanced needs of diverse familial configurations. The second proposition is that queer is a multifaceted stance: queer exists not in the binary opposition of inclusion and exclusion but in the possibility space, as an investment in subversion that has the potential to generate alternative forms of being in the world. And queer, which is mistakenly assumed to be applicable primarily to non-normative sexual or gender identities, both includes and transcends matters of sex and gender. Grounded in these two propositions, this work exhorts us to keep exploring the yet-to-be-known potential of the queer perspective as a powerful methodological tool in the arsenal of critical legal analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score0.278

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.013
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0830.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.456
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicFeminism, Gender, and Sexuality StudiesFrench-language works237,207