MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7132893506

Ustašism as Ideology and Practice: Mass Violence and Genocide in Vukovar District, Croatia, 1939-1945

2024· dissertation· W7132893506 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Danijel Matijevic

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2024
Typedissertation
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicBalkans: History, Politics, Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of TorontoSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaConference on Jewish Material Claims Against GermanyNorthwestern University
KeywordsIdeologyPeasantPopulationGenocideState (computer science)NationalismSectarianismBureaucracy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dissertation analyzes the ideology of the Ustaša movement and its practice in the Independent State of Croatia (Nezavisna Država Hrvatska, NDH) under the Ustaša regimeduring World War II. Using a case study of the town of Vukovar, this study connects ideas with on-the-ground violence, identifying vectors of ideological dissemination into local communities. In terms of sources, this history makes special use of printed primary sources—books, pamphlets, and newspapers—which were dissected for ideological content, contemporary documents, and postwar testimonies, which provided information on practices and experiences of violence. Rooted in Croat right-wing nationalist tradition, Ustašism claimed as its foundation the thought of nineteenth-century intellectual Ante Starčević, whose ideas served as the prism through which Croat right-wing nationalism, including Ustašism, conceptualized key parameters of the Croat national project. Once in power, the regime implemented Ustašism’s mandates into Croatia’s socio-political arrangements and priorities, employing the media and a broad front of state-controlled organizations. To enforce the nation as the paramount value, the regime resorted to limitless violence, which it used as a concrete, on-the-ground method to hammer Ustašism into local communities. Ustašist principles governed Ustaša population policy. The regime used mass killings and deportations to remove the population it judged incompatible with “new Croatia”: primarily Jews, Roma, and Serb elites as carriers of the Serb national project in the NDH. The majority of the Serb population, mostly peasant non-elites, the regime erased as “Serbs” from NDH’s population categories and subjected to “double conversion”: religious conversion to Catholicism or Croatian Orthodoxy and bureaucratic conversion to Croat ethnonationality. Ustašism’s historical narrative considered these people “Croats-of-old,” whom “foreign elements” had manipulated into Serb identity. The regime also launched a campaign of violent repression of those it identified as Croat national “renegades.” Like in Jews, Roma, and Serb elites, in Croat “renegades” Ustašism recognized “internal enemies,” who carried the stigma of racial-ethnonational “foreignness” and inferiority. Furthermore, even as the regime and its local activists controlled the ideological agenda, ordinary people like “citizen Croat,” the anonymous author of a threatening note, appropriated its logic, threatening to open ideological horizons beyond the regime’s grip.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.245

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.361 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicBalkans: History, Politics, Society→French-language works237,207→