MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132894210

The relationships among perceptions of healthcare quality culture, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment among teaching hospital nurses

2003· dissertation· W7132894210 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mariatou Jallow

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2003
Typedissertation
Language
FieldNursing
TopicNursing education and management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrganizational commitmentJob satisfactionPerceptionQuality (philosophy)Organizational cultureHealth careAffect (linguistics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective. This study investigates the relationships among perceptions of healthcare quality culture, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment among teaching hospital nurses. Design. Secondary data analysis. Methods. Primary data were collected from staff nurses by mail surveys in four Toronto, Canada teaching hospitals (n = 1327). Healthcare quality culture was measured using the 6 subscales of the Quality in Action instrument developed at the University of Toronto. Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment Scales were adapted from existing measures. Results and major findings. All of the Quality in Action scales were significantly and positively correlated with Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment. Management Style had the largest correlations. Conclusion. The results suggest that perceptions of healthcare quality culture are related to job satisfaction and organizational commitment among nurses. Management Style is particularly important in this relationship and hospital managers need to understand how their activities may affect nurses' evaluations of their jobs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.088

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicNursing education and managementFrench-language works237,207